↓ Skip to main content

Female and male Blue Tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) sing in response to experimental predator exposition

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,789)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Female and male Blue Tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) sing in response to experimental predator exposition
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10336-016-1345-3
Authors

Katharina Mahr, Carlo L. Seifert, Herbert Hoi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 22%
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 63%
Environmental Science 5 12%
Philosophy 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#209,269
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#5
of 1,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,797
of 305,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.