↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Dimethoate Residues in Olives at the Time of Harvest and After Brine Using QuEChERS Extraction

Overview of attention for article published in Food Analytical Methods, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of Dimethoate Residues in Olives at the Time of Harvest and After Brine Using QuEChERS Extraction
Published in
Food Analytical Methods, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12161-016-0506-6
Authors

Paula Paíga, Carla Meneses, David H. Lopes, Manuela Correia, Cristina Delerue-Matos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 17%
Engineering 2 17%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,799,386
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Food Analytical Methods
#216
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,049
of 299,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Analytical Methods
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.