Title |
Viewing Imaging Studies: How Patient Location and Imaging Site Affect Referring Physicians
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10278-019-00279-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fatemeh Homayounieh, Ramandeep Singh, Tianqi Chen, Ellen J. Sugarman, Thomas J. Schultz, Subba R. Digumarthy, Keith J. Dreyer, Mannudeep K. Kalra |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 12% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Librarian | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 65% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
Psychology | 2 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,257,499
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#136
of 1,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,055
of 340,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.