↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a quality improvement collaborative in reducing time to surgery for patients requiring emergency cholecystectomy

Overview of attention for article published in BJS Open , October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 834)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
55 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a quality improvement collaborative in reducing time to surgery for patients requiring emergency cholecystectomy
Published in
BJS Open , October 2019
DOI 10.1002/bjs5.50221
Pubmed ID
Authors

J R Bamber, T J Stephens, D A Cromwell, E Duncan, G P Martin, N F Quiney, J F Abercrombie, I J Beckingham, J Abraham, I Ahmad, J Ahmed, M Andrews, B Appleton, M Asif, R Bolton, C Briggs, U Bumagat, S Burchfield, G Cochrane, F Dewi, G Dovell, S Dyer, J Edge, R Edwards, I Fabre, E Gemmill, E Griffiths, D Hariharan, E Harrington-Patel, A Hassn, M Hepworth, J Hewes, S Hine, M Hollyman, K Ide, D Jenner, R Johnson, S Jordan, S Karamanakos, J Kovoor, N Kukreja, G Marangoni, N Metcalfe, P Morcous, P Needham, N Patel, N Qureshi, N Rajaretnam, I Rajendran, Y Sabah, D L Sanders, A Sandison, J Sansom, R Seth, V Shetty, T Sollei, S Strong, L Sullivan, R P Sutcliffe, L Talbot, G Taylor, V Varadarajan, E Villatoro, J Wardale, S Weaver, T Wiggins, A Wood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 21%
Other 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 39%
Psychology 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,186,757
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from BJS Open
#42
of 834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,681
of 366,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJS Open
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.