You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Comparative Study of Biogas Reactor Fluid Rheology—Implications for Mixing Profile and Power Demand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Processes, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3390/pr7100700 |
| Authors |
Luka Šafarič, Sepehr Shakeri Yekta, Jörgen Ejlertsson, Mohammad Safari, Hossein Nadali Najafabadi, Anna Karlsson, Francesco Ometto, Bo H. Svensson, Annika Björn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 38% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 14% |
| Energy | 3 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,926,241
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Processes
#553
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,312
of 350,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Processes
#21
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.