| Title |
Population responses of bird populations to climate change on two continents vary with species’ ecological traits but not with direction of change in climate suitability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-019-02549-9 |
| Authors |
Lucy R. Mason, Rhys E. Green, Christine Howard, Philip A. Stephens, Stephen G. Willis, Ainars Aunins, Lluís Brotons, Tomasz Chodkiewicz, Przemysław Chylarecki, Virginia Escandell, Ruud P. B. Foppen, Sergi Herrando, Magne Husby, Frédéric Jiguet, John Atle Kålås, Åke Lindström, Dario Massimino, Charlotte Moshøj, Renno Nellis, Jean-Yves Paquet, Jiří Reif, Päivi M. Sirkiä, Tibor Szép, Guido Tellini Florenzano, Norbert Teufelbauer, Sven Trautmann, Arco van Strien, Chris A. M. van Turnhout, Petr Voříšek, Richard D. Gregory |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 46% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Latvia | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 70% |
| Scientists | 13 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 130 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#986,179
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#505
of 6,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,348
of 369,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#14
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.