You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Treosulfan or busulfan plus fludarabine as conditioning treatment before allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MC-FludT.14/L): a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Haematology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2352-3026(19)30157-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dietrich Wilhelm Beelen, Rudolf Trenschel, Matthias Stelljes, Christoph Groth, Tamás Masszi, Péter Reményi, Eva-Maria Wagner-Drouet, Beate Hauptrock, Peter Dreger, Thomas Luft, Wolfgang Bethge, Wichard Vogel, Fabio Ciceri, Jacopo Peccatori, Friedrich Stölzel, Johannes Schetelig, Christian Junghanß, Christina Grosse-Thie, Mauricette Michallet, Hélène Labussiere-Wallet, Kerstin Schaefer-Eckart, Sabine Dressler, Goetz Ulrich Grigoleit, Stephan Mielke, Christof Scheid, Udo Holtick, Francesca Patriarca, Marta Medeot, Alessandro Rambaldi, Maria Caterina Micò, Dietger Niederwieser, Georg-Nikolaus Franke, Inken Hilgendorf, Nils Rudolf Winkelmann, Domenico Russo, Gérard Socié, Régis Peffault de Latour, Ernst Holler, Daniel Wolff, Bertram Glass, Jochen Casper, Gerald Wulf, Helge Menzel, Nadezda Basara, Maria Bieniaszewska, Gernot Stuhler, Mareike Verbeek, Sandra Grass, Anna Paola Iori, Juergen Finke, Fabio Benedetti, Uwe Pichlmeier, Claudia Hemmelmann, Michael Tribanek, Anja Klein, Heidrun Anke Mylius, Joachim Baumgart, Monika Dzierzak-Mietla, Miroslaw Markiewicz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Algeria | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 67% |
| Scientists | 9 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 37% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#818,495
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Haematology
#156
of 1,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,065
of 366,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Haematology
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.