↓ Skip to main content

Sentinel Node in Oral Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Nuclear Medicine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sentinel Node in Oral Cancer
Published in
Clinical Nuclear Medicine, July 2016
DOI 10.1097/rlu.0000000000001241
Pubmed ID
Authors

Girolamo Tartaglione, Sandro J Stoeckli, Remco de Bree, Clare Schilling, Geke B Flach, Vivi Bakholdt, Jens Ahm Sorensen, Anders Bilde, Christian von Buchwald, Georges Lawson, Didier Dequanter, Pedro M Villarreal, Manuel Florentino Fresno Forcelledo, Julio Alvarez Amezaga, Augusto Moreira, Tito Poli, Cesare Grandi, Maurizio Giovanni Vigili, Michael O'Doherty, Davide Donner, Elisabeth Bloemena, Siavash Rahimi, Benjamin Gurney, Stephan K Haerle, Martina A Broglie, Gerhard F Huber, Annelise L Krogdah, Lars R Sebbesen, Edward Odell, Luis Manuel Junquera Gutierrez, Luis Barbier, Joseba Santamaria-Zuazua, Manuel Jacome, Marie-Cecile Nollevaux, Emma Bragantini, Philippe Lothaire, Enrico M Silini, Enrico Sesenna, Giles Dolivet, Romina Mastronicola, Agnes Leroux, Isabel Sassoon, Philip Sloan, Patrick M Colletti, Domenico Rubello, Mark McGurk

Abstract

Nuclear imaging plays a crucial role in lymphatic mapping of oral cancer. This evaluation represents a subanalysis of the original multicenter SENT trial data set, involving 434 patients with T1-T2, N0, and M0 oral squamous cell carcinoma. The impact of acquisition techniques, tracer injection timing relative to surgery, and causes of false-negative rate were assessed. Three to 24 hours before surgery, all patients received a dose of Tc-nanocolloid (10-175 MBq), followed by lymphoscintigraphy. According to institutional protocols, all patients underwent preoperative dynamic/static scan and/or SPECT/CT. Lymphoscintigraphy identified 723 lymphatic basins. 1398 sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) were biopsied (3.2 SN per patient; range, 1-10). Dynamic scan allowed the differentiation of sentinel nodes from second tier lymph nodes. SPECT/CT allowed more accurate anatomical localization and estimated SN depth more efficiently. After pathological examination, 9.9% of the SN excised (138 of 1398 SNs) showed metastases. The first neck level (NL) containing SN+ was NL I in 28.6%, NL IIa in 44.8%, NL IIb in 2.8%, NL III in 17.1%, and NL IV in 6.7% of positive patients. Approximately 96% of positive SNs were localized in the first and second lymphatic basin visualized using lymphoscintigraphy. After neck dissection, the SN+ was the only lymph node containing metastasis in approximately 80% of patients. Best results were observed using a dynamic scan in combination with SPECT/CT. A shorter interval between tracer injection, imaging, and surgery resulted in a lower false-negative rate. At least 2 NLs have to be harvested, as this may increase the detection of lymphatic metastases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 12 28%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2016.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nuclear Medicine
#1,038
of 5,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,242
of 367,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nuclear Medicine
#19
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,006 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.