↓ Skip to main content

Meiofauna versus macrofauna as a food resource in a tropical intertidal mudflat

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Meiofauna versus macrofauna as a food resource in a tropical intertidal mudflat
Published in
Marine Biology, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00227-019-3588-z
Authors

Pierre-Yves Pascal, Pierrick Bocher, Christel Lefrançois, Hien T. Nguyen, Johan Chevalier, Christine Dupuy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 28%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#20,582,908
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#3,115
of 3,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,538
of 352,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#38
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.