↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of syphilis infection in different tiers of female sex workers in China: implications for surveillance and interventions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Prevalence of syphilis infection in different tiers of female sex workers in China: implications for surveillance and interventions
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-84
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiang-Sheng Chen, Qian-Qiu Wang, Yue-Ping Yin, Guo-Jun Liang, Ning Jiang, Li-Gang Yang, Qiao Liu, Yu-Jiao Zhou, Xi-Ping Huan, Wan-Hui Wei, Baoxi Wang

Abstract

Syphilis has made a dramatic resurgence in China during the past two decades and become the third most prevalent notifiable infectious disease in China. Female sex workers (FSWs) have become one of key populations for the epidemic. In order to investigate syphilis infection among different tiers of FSWs, a cross-sectional study was conducted in 8 sites in China.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 47%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2012.
All research outputs
#13,128,940
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,142
of 7,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,288
of 161,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#34
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.