| Title |
Risk factors for severe systemic sting reactions in wasp (Vespula spp.) and honeybee (Apis mellifera ) venom allergic patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-019-0292-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle Fehr, Sara Micaletto, Thomas Moehr, Peter Schmid‐Grendelmeier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,820,802
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#85
of 664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,881
of 352,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.