↓ Skip to main content

Nonvanishing theorems for L-functions of modular forms and their derivatives

Overview of attention for article published in Inventiones mathematicae, December 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Nonvanishing theorems for L-functions of modular forms and their derivatives
Published in
Inventiones mathematicae, December 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01233440
Authors

Daniel Bump, Solomon Friedberg, Jeffrey Hoffstein

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 5 63%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Inventiones mathematicae
#203
of 1,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,846
of 59,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inventiones mathematicae
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.