↓ Skip to main content

Could plant diversity metrics explain climate-driven vegetation changes on mountain summits of the GLORIA network?

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Could plant diversity metrics explain climate-driven vegetation changes on mountain summits of the GLORIA network?
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10531-019-01837-1
Authors

Francesco Porro, Marcello Tomaselli, Thomas Abeli, Maurizia Gandini, Matteo Gualmini, Simone Orsenigo, Alessandro Petraglia, Graziano Rossi, Michele Carbognani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 31%
Environmental Science 11 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Unknown 18 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,173,573
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,146
of 2,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,993
of 346,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#20
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.