↓ Skip to main content

ASBMB

Why Glycosylation Matters in Building a Better Flu Vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why Glycosylation Matters in Building a Better Flu Vaccine
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, October 2019
DOI 10.1074/mcp.r119.001491
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah Chang, Joseph Zaia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 23 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 18%
Chemistry 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 26 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,593,186
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
#158
of 3,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,416
of 367,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.