↓ Skip to main content

The global spread of Zika virus: is public and media concern justified in regions currently unaffected?

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases of Poverty, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
Title
The global spread of Zika virus: is public and media concern justified in regions currently unaffected?
Published in
Infectious Diseases of Poverty, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40249-016-0132-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Narayan Gyawali, Richard S. Bradbury, Andrew W. Taylor-Robinson

Abstract

Zika virus, an Aedes mosquito-borne flavivirus, is fast becoming a worldwide public health concern following its suspected association with over 4000 recent cases of microcephaly among newborn infants in Brazil. Prior to its emergence in Latin America in 2015-2016, Zika was known to exist at a relatively low prevalence in parts of Africa, Asia and the Pacific islands. An extension of its apparent global dispersion may be enabled by climate conditions suitable to support the population growth of A. aegypti and A. albopictus mosquitoes over an expanding geographical range. In addition, increased globalisation continues to pose a risk for the spread of infection. Further, suspicions of alternative modes of virus transmission (sexual and vertical), if proven, provide a platform for outbreaks in mosquito non-endemic regions as well. Since a vaccine or anti-viral therapy is not yet available, current means of disease prevention involve protection from mosquito bites, excluding pregnant females from travelling to Zika-endemic territories, and practicing safe sex in those countries. Importantly, in countries where Zika is reported as endemic, caution is advised in planning to conceive a baby until such time as the apparent association between infection with the virus and microcephaly is either confirmed or refuted. The question arises as to what advice is appropriate to give in more economically developed countries distant to the current epidemic and in which Zika has not yet been reported. Despite understandable concern among the general public that has been fuelled by the media, in regions where Zika is not present, such as North America, Europe and Australia, at this time any outbreak (initiated by an infected traveler returning from an endemic area) would very probably be contained locally. Since Aedes spp. has very limited spatial dispersal, overlapping high population densities of mosquitoes and humans would be needed to sustain a focus of infection. However, as A. aegypti is distinctly anthropophilic, future control strategies for Zika should be considered in tandem with the continuing threat to human wellbeing that is presented by dengue, yellow fever and Japanese encephalitis, all of which are transmitted by the same vector species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 236 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 21%
Student > Bachelor 37 15%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Other 14 6%
Other 51 21%
Unknown 40 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 7%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 49 20%