↓ Skip to main content

The value of the GP’s clinical judgement in predicting dementia: a multicentre prospective cohort study among patients in general practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
The value of the GP’s clinical judgement in predicting dementia: a multicentre prospective cohort study among patients in general practice
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, October 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x706037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Pentzek, Michael Wagner, Heinz-Harald Abholz, Horst Bickel, Hanna Kaduszkiewicz, Birgitt Wiese, Siegfried Weyerer, Hans-Helmut König, Martin Scherer, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Wolfgang Maier, Alexander Koppara, for the AgeCoDe Study Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 1 2%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 27%
Psychology 4 10%
Engineering 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,341,326
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#664
of 4,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,196
of 352,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#17
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.