| Title |
Efficacy of educational intervention on reducing the inappropriate use of oral third-generation cephalosporins
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infection, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s15010-019-01362-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Atsushi Uda, Takeshi Kimura, Sho Nishimura, Kei Ebisawa, Goh Ohji, Mari Kusuki, Mariko Yahata, Rie Izuta, Tomoyuki Sakaue, Tatsuya Nakamura, Chihiro Koike, Issei Tokimatsu, Ikuko Yano, Kentaro Iwata, Takayuki Miyara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,411,710
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#389
of 1,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,977
of 368,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.