↓ Skip to main content

Clinical significance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in chronic kidney disease: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ultrasound, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Clinical significance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in chronic kidney disease: a pilot study
Published in
Journal of Ultrasound, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40477-019-00409-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seokmin Jeong, Sung Bin Park, Su-Hyun Kim, Jin Ho Hwang, Jungho Shin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Other 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ultrasound
#301
of 652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,576
of 368,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ultrasound
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 652 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.