↓ Skip to main content

Use of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging to monitor a rat kidney chronic allograft damage model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Use of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging to monitor a rat kidney chronic allograft damage model
Published in
BMC Nephrology, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12882-019-1545-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiang Zhang, Zexing Yu, Song Zeng, Lu Liang, Yue Xu, Zijian Zhang, Hao Tang, Wenjiao Jiao, Wenrui Xue, Wei Wang, Xiaodong Zhang, Tao Jiang, Xiaopeng Hu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Professor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2020.
All research outputs
#18,694,159
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#1,906
of 2,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,109
of 352,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#46
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.