↓ Skip to main content

The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Genetics, October 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
777 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
550 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation
Published in
Nature Reviews Genetics, October 2000
DOI 10.1038/35049558
Pubmed ID
Authors

James F. Crow

Abstract

The germline mutation rate in human males, especially older males, is generally much higher than in females, mainly because in males there are many more germ-cell divisions. However, there are some exceptions and many variations. Base substitutions, insertion-deletions, repeat expansions and chromosomal changes each follow different rules. Evidence from evolutionary sequence data indicates that the overall rate of deleterious mutation may be high enough to have a large effect on human well-being. But there are ways in which the impact of deleterious mutations can be mitigated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 550 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 3%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Austria 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 509 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 117 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 18%
Student > Master 64 12%
Student > Bachelor 58 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 41 7%
Other 111 20%
Unknown 60 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 225 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 110 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 78 14%
Psychology 14 3%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Other 40 7%
Unknown 74 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2023.
All research outputs
#213,185
of 24,692,658 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#93
of 2,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93
of 38,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,692,658 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.