| Title |
Competing biosecurity and risk rationalities in the Chittagong poultry commodity chain, Bangladesh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioSocieties, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1057/s41292-018-0131-2 |
| Authors |
Erling Høg, Guillaume Fournié, Md. Ahasanul Hoque, Rashed Mahmud, Dirk U. Pfeiffer, Tony Barnett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 28% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,131,756
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
#17
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,583
of 345,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.