↓ Skip to main content

No evidence of citation bias as a determinant of STEM gender disparities in US biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology research

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
No evidence of citation bias as a determinant of STEM gender disparities in US biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology research
Published in
Scientometrics, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11192-019-03271-0
Authors

Mike Thelwall, Tamara Nevill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Librarian 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 11%
Computer Science 1 5%
Decision Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#19,763,498
of 25,159,758 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#2,387
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,225
of 361,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#43
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,159,758 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.