↓ Skip to main content

How Many Agents are Rational in China’s Economy? Evidence from a Heterogeneous Agent-Based New Keynesian Model

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Economics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
How Many Agents are Rational in China’s Economy? Evidence from a Heterogeneous Agent-Based New Keynesian Model
Published in
Computational Economics, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10614-018-9844-3
Authors

Wei Zhao, Yi Lu, Genfu Feng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 44%
Computer Science 1 11%
Mathematics 1 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,583,959
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from Computational Economics
#113
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,360
of 333,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Economics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.