You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mentalization-based therapy adherence and competence stimulates in-session mentalization in psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder with co-morbid substance dependence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychotherapy Research, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10503307.2016.1158433 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clara Möller, Linda Karlgren, Anton Sandell, Fredrik Falkenström, Björn Philips |
| Abstract |
To test whether adherence to mentalization-based treatment (MBT) principles predict better patient in-session mentalizing. Two sessions for each of 15 patients with borderline personality disorder and comorbid substance abuse disorder were rated for MBT adherence and competence. Individual patient statements were rated for Reflective Functioning (RF), therapist statements were rated as demanding RF or not. Data were analysed using multilevel modelling. MBT adherence and competence predicted higher session RF (β = .58-.75), even while controlling for pre-treatment RF. In addition, therapist interventions directed toward exploring mental states predicted higher RF of subsequent patient responses (β = .11-.12). MBT adherence and competence were significantly related to patient in-session mentalizing, supporting the validity of MBT principles. Results point to the importance of supervision for therapists to become adherent to MBT principles. The small number of patients and sessions limits generalizability of results. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 66 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 75 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 74 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,453,763
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Psychotherapy Research
#548
of 664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,119
of 299,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychotherapy Research
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.