↓ Skip to main content

Nano-sized cosmetic formulations or solid nanoparticles in sunscreens: A risk to human health?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Nano-sized cosmetic formulations or solid nanoparticles in sunscreens: A risk to human health?
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00204-012-0831-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerhard J. Nohynek, Eric K. Dufour

Abstract

Personal care products (PCP) often contain micron- or nano-sized formulation components, such as nanoemulsions or microscopic vesicles. A large number of studies suggest that such vesicles do not penetrate human skin beyond the superficial layers of the stratum corneum. Nano-sized PCP formulations may enhance or reduce skin absorption of ingredients, albeit at a limited scale. Modern sunscreens contain insoluble titanium dioxide (TiO₂) or zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (NP), which are efficient filters of UV light. A large number of studies suggest that insoluble NP do not penetrate into or through human skin. A number of in vivo toxicity tests, including in vivo intravenous studies, showed that TiO₂ and ZnO NP are non-toxic and have an excellent skin tolerance. Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, photo-genotoxicity, general toxicity and carcinogenicity studies on TiO₂ and ZnO NP found no difference in the safety profile of micro- or nano-sized materials, all of which were found to be non-toxic. Although some published in vitro studies on insoluble nano- or micron-sized particles suggested cell uptake, oxidative cell damage or genotoxicity, these data are consistent with those from micron-sized particles and should be interpreted with caution. Data on insoluble NP, such as surgical implant-derived wear debris particles or intravenously administered magnetic resonance contrast agents suggest that toxicity of small particles is generally related to their chemistry rather than their particle size. Overall, the weight of scientific evidence suggests that insoluble NP used in sunscreens pose no or negligible risk to human health, but offer large health benefits, such as the protection of human skin against UV-induced skin ageing and cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 195 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 17%
Student > Master 32 16%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 34 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 16%
Chemistry 33 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 45 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2013.
All research outputs
#19,147,545
of 24,380,741 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#2,264
of 2,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,216
of 164,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,380,741 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.