↓ Skip to main content

Crosslink Density Is Reduced and Oxidation Is Increased in Retrieved Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene TKA Tibial Inserts

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Crosslink Density Is Reduced and Oxidation Is Increased in Retrieved Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene TKA Tibial Inserts
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11999-016-4820-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tong Liu, Christina I Esposito, Jayme C Burket, Timothy M Wright

Abstract

The wear resistance of highly crosslinked polyethylene depends on crosslink density, which may decrease with in vivo loading, leading to more wear and increased oxidation. The relationship among large and complex in vivo mechanical stresses, breakdown of the polyethylene crosslinks, and oxidative degradation is not fully understood in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We wished to determine whether crosslink density is reduced at the articular surfaces of retrieved tibial inserts in contact areas exposed to in vivo mechanical stress. (1) Does polyethylene crosslink density decrease preferentially in regions of the articular surface of thermally stabilized crosslinked polyethylene tibial components exposed to mechanical stress in vivo; and (2) what is the ramification of decreased crosslink density in TKA in terms of accompanying oxidation of the polyethylene? From May 2011 to January 2014, 90 crosslinked polyethylene tibial components were retrieved during revision surgery as a part of a long-standing implant retrieval program. Forty highly crosslinked polyethylene tibial inserts (27 posterior-stabilized designs and 13 cruciate-retaining designs) retrieved for instability (15 cases), stiffness (11), infection (six), aseptic loosening (four), pain (two), and malposition (two) after a mean time of 18 months were inspected microscopically to identify loaded (burnished) and unloaded (unburnished) regions on the articular surfaces. Swell ratio testing was done according to ASTM F2214 to calculate crosslink density and infrared spectroscopy was used according to ASTM F2102 to measure oxidation. The region of the tibial insert influenced crosslink density. Loaded surface regions had a mean crosslink density of 0.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.19) mol/dm(3), lower than the other three regions (loaded subsurface, unloaded surface, and unloaded subsurface), which had crosslink densities of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.21-0.22; p < 0.01) mol/dm(3). Peak oxidation levels were higher in loaded regions with a mean oxidation index (OI) of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56-0.78) versus unloaded regions with a mean OI of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.27-0.45; p < 0.01). Peak oxidation levels were higher in annealed samples with a mean OI of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.52-0.81) versus remelted samples with a mean OI of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.34-0.47; p < 0.01). The results suggest that the crosslink density decreases and accompanying oxidation is driven predominantly by contact stress conditions. If crosslink density continues to decrease with continued loading over time, crosslinked polyethylene may not provide a clinical advantage over conventional polyethylene in the long term for TKA. Therefore, we will continue to collect longer term retrievals to evaluate mechanical property changes in crosslinked polyethylenes. Although we found a decrease in crosslink density and increase in oxidation in the tibial inserts, the degree of oxidation does not suggest, for now, a reason for concern in these early retrievals. The OI values of the tibial inserts in this study were lower than the critical oxidation level (OI > 3) reported in the literature where polyethylene may lose mechanical properties and have the compromised ability to withstand mechanical loading.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 21%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Engineering 5 9%
Materials Science 5 9%
Unspecified 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,198,593
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,965
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,199
of 421,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#30
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.