You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
移植困難植物の保全現場で野外播種試験をどのように活用していくか
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.7211/jjsrt.44.540 |
| Authors |
庄司 顕則, 遊川 知久, 大城 温, 大和 政秀, 蘭光 健人, 伊藤 彩乃, 山﨑 旬, 辻田 有紀 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
#26
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,441
of 367,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.