| Title |
Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Therapy, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12325-019-01055-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastiano Mercadante, Antonio Voza, Sossio Serra, Germana Ruggiano, Giuseppe Carpinteri, Gianfilippo Gangitano, Fabio Intelligente, Elisabetta Bonafede, Antonella Sblendido, Alberto Farina, Amedeo Soldi, Andrea Fabbri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 51 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,756,374
of 23,798,792 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#612
of 2,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,712
of 356,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#23
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,798,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.