↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: eight ways to prevent cancer: a framework for effective prevention messages for the public

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Commentary: eight ways to prevent cancer: a framework for effective prevention messages for the public
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10552-012-9924-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hank Dart, Kathleen Y. Wolin, Graham A. Colditz

Abstract

Research over the past 40 years has convincingly shown that lifestyle factors play a huge role in cancer incidence and mortality. The public, though, can often discount the preventability of cancer. That health information on the Internet is a vast and often scientifically suspect commodity makes promoting important and sound cancer prevention messages to the public even more difficult. To help address these issues and improve the public's knowledge of, and attitudes toward, cancer prevention, there need to be concerted efforts to create evidence-based, user-friendly information about behaviors that could greatly reduce overall cancer risk. Toward this end, we condensed the current scientific evidence on the topic into eight key behaviors. While not an end in themselves, "Eight Ways to Stay Healthy and Prevent Cancer" forms an evidence-based and targeted framework that supports broader cancer prevention efforts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Psychology 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 18 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,455,053
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#845
of 2,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,808
of 168,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.