↓ Skip to main content

Video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy combined with transmanubrial approach for anterior Pancoast tumor resection: case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy combined with transmanubrial approach for anterior Pancoast tumor resection: case report
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13019-016-0446-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorenzo Rosso, Alessandro Palleschi, Paolo Mendogni, Mario Nosotti

Abstract

The mini-ivasive approach to superior sulcus tumors is an uncommon procedure that is still far from standardization. We describe a hybrid surgical technique to approach "en block" chest resection and pulmonary lobectomy for anterior superior sulcus tumors. A patient affected by right anterior Pancoast tumor surgically staged as cT4N0M0 (suspected anonymous vein invasion) underwent chemo-radiation induction therapy with satisfactory tumor reduction. The surgical operation comprised an initial VATS approach to the hilar structures followed by a limited C-shaped anterior contra-incision; finally, the right upper lobe "en block" with the anterior part of the first and second rib was removed. The whole procedure was conducted with the patient in the supine position; no rib retractors were used. The definitive stage was ypT0N0M0. The patient had an uneventful hospital stay and at the 9 months follow-up she was free from disease and post-thoracotomy syndrome. In our opinion such hybrid VATS procedure has several advantages: starting with thoracoscopy it is possibleto exclude previously undetected pleural dissemination and to precisely define the tumor location as well as limits of the thoracic wall resection; time could be spared maintaining the patients in the supine position for both surgical times; postoperative pain and post-thoracotomy syndrome could be minimized avoiding the use of any rib retractor.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 56%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#1,075
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,411
of 315,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.