Title |
Erosion of phylogenetic diversity in Neotropical bat assemblages: findings from a whole-ecosystem fragmentation experiment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10531-019-01864-y |
Authors |
Sabhrina G. Aninta, Ricardo Rocha, Adrià López-Baucells, Christoph F. J. Meyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 23% |
Ireland | 2 | 7% |
Portugal | 2 | 7% |
Spain | 2 | 7% |
Mexico | 2 | 7% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Philippines | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 67% |
Scientists | 8 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 24% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 47% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,038,754
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#286
of 2,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,049
of 360,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.