You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Avian mercury exposure and toxicological risk across western North America: A synthesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science of the Total Environment, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.071 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joshua T. Ackerman, Collin A. Eagles-Smith, Mark P. Herzog, C. Alex Hartman, Sarah H. Peterson, David C. Evers, Allyson K. Jackson, John E. Elliott, Stacy S. Vander Pol, Colleen E. Bryan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 60% |
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 257 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 46 | 18% |
Student > Master | 43 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
Other | 14 | 5% |
Other | 37 | 14% |
Unknown | 56 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 26% |
Environmental Science | 63 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
Chemistry | 10 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 3% |
Other | 21 | 8% |
Unknown | 78 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,828,595
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#2,469
of 30,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,419
of 317,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#37
of 324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.