You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tropical cyclones and the organization of mangrove forests: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mcz161 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ken W Krauss, Michael J Osland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 20 | 35% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Colombia | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Lithuania | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 65% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 18% |
| Scientists | 10 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 246 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 13% |
| Researcher | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 88 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 59 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 7% |
| Engineering | 10 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 103 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2021.
All research outputs
#746,849
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#69
of 3,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,373
of 368,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#4
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.