↓ Skip to main content

Presence–Absence versus Abundance Data for Monitoring Threatened Species

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
724 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Presence–Absence versus Abundance Data for Monitoring Threatened Species
Published in
Conservation Biology, August 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00529.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

LIANA N. JOSEPH, SCOTT A. FIELD, CHRIS WILCOX, HUGH P. POSSINGHAM

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 724 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 16 2%
United States 15 2%
Australia 6 <1%
South Africa 5 <1%
India 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 653 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 208 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 141 19%
Student > Master 80 11%
Other 48 7%
Student > Bachelor 41 6%
Other 140 19%
Unknown 66 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 400 55%
Environmental Science 189 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 1%
Social Sciences 6 <1%
Other 19 3%
Unknown 86 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,009,134
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#2,534
of 4,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,608
of 95,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#20
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.