| Title |
No evidence for novel weapons: biochemical recognition modulates early ontogenetic processes in native species and invasive acacias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-019-02110-w |
| Authors |
Florencia A. Yannelli, Ana Novoa, Paula Lorenzo, Jonatan Rodríguez, Johannes J. Le Roux |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| South Africa | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Argentina | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 27% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,540,984
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#835
of 2,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,302
of 372,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#23
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.