You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
1200 years of Upper Missouri River streamflow reconstructed from tree rings
|
---|---|
Published in |
Quaternary Science Reviews, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.105971 |
Authors |
Justin T. Martin, Gregory T. Pederson, Connie A. Woodhouse, Edward R. Cook, Gregory J. McCabe, Erika K. Wise, Patrick Erger, Larry Dolan, Marketa McGuire, Subhrendu Gangopadhyay, Katherine Chase, Jeremy S. Littell, Stephen T. Gray, Scott St. George, Jonathan Friedman, Dave Sauchyn, Jeannine St. Jacques, John King |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 67% |
Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 27% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 18% |
Engineering | 4 | 12% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,796,855
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#831
of 3,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,465
of 378,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#23
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.