Title |
The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer® is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-012-2237-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cyril Perrenot, Manuela Perez, Nguyen Tran, Jean-Philippe Jehl, Jacques Felblinger, Laurent Bresler, Jacques Hubert |
Abstract |
Exponential development of minimally invasive techniques, such as robotic-assisted devices, raises the question of how to assess robotic surgery skills. Early development of virtual simulators has provided efficient tools for laparoscopic skills certification based on objective scoring, high availability, and lower cost. However, similar evaluation is lacking for robotic training. The purpose of this study was to assess several criteria, such as reliability, face, content, construct, and concurrent validity of a new virtual robotic surgery simulator. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 134 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 11% |
Researcher | 14 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
Other | 33 | 24% |
Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 34% |
Engineering | 18 | 13% |
Computer Science | 15 | 11% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Unknown | 34 | 24% |