↓ Skip to main content

The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
86 patents
wikipedia
45 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9717 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5066 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David N. Louis, Hiroko Ohgaki, Otmar D. Wiestler, Webster K. Cavenee, Peter C. Burger, Anne Jouvet, Bernd W. Scheithauer, Paul Kleihues

Abstract

The fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumours of the central nervous system, published in 2007, lists several new entities, including angiocentric glioma, papillary glioneuronal tumour, rosette-forming glioneuronal tumour of the fourth ventricle, papillary tumour of the pineal region, pituicytoma and spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis. Histological variants were added if there was evidence of a different age distribution, location, genetic profile or clinical behaviour; these included pilomyxoid astrocytoma, anaplastic medulloblastoma and medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity. The WHO grading scheme and the sections on genetic profiles were updated and the rhabdoid tumour predisposition syndrome was added to the list of familial tumour syndromes typically involving the nervous system. As in the previous, 2000 edition of the WHO 'Blue Book', the classification is accompanied by a concise commentary on clinico-pathological characteristics of each tumour type. The 2007 WHO classification is based on the consensus of an international Working Group of 25 pathologists and geneticists, as well as contributions from more than 70 international experts overall, and is presented as the standard for the definition of brain tumours to the clinical oncology and cancer research communities world-wide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5,066 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 35 <1%
Brazil 16 <1%
Germany 12 <1%
United Kingdom 12 <1%
Netherlands 8 <1%
Italy 8 <1%
Belgium 7 <1%
Spain 7 <1%
France 6 <1%
Other 61 1%
Unknown 4894 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 744 15%
Student > Master 741 15%
Student > Bachelor 695 14%
Researcher 541 11%
Student > Postgraduate 390 8%
Other 975 19%
Unknown 980 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1579 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 715 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 599 12%
Neuroscience 288 6%
Engineering 133 3%
Other 606 12%
Unknown 1146 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#675,856
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#93
of 2,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,006
of 80,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.