| Title |
The GUSS test as a good indicator to evaluate dysphagia in healthy older people: a multicenter reliability and validity study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Geriatric Medicine, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s41999-019-00249-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ebru Umay, Sibel Eyigor, Ali Yavuz Karahan, Ilknur Albayrak Gezer, Ayse Kurkcu, Dilek Keskin, Gulten Karaca, Zeliha Unlu, Canan Tıkız, Meltem Vural, Banu Aydeniz, Ebru Alemdaroglu, Emine Esra Bilir, Ayse Yalıman, Ekin Ilke Sen, Mazlum Serdar Akaltun, Ozlem Altındag, Betul Yavuz Keles, Meral Bilgilisoy, Zeynep Alev Ozcete, Aylin Demirhan, Ibrahim Gundogdu, Murat Inanir, Yalkin Calik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Austria | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Turkey | 1 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,967,872
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from European Geriatric Medicine
#297
of 870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,302
of 366,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Geriatric Medicine
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.