↓ Skip to main content

Uroepithelial and kidney carcinoma in Lynch syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Familial Cancer, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Uroepithelial and kidney carcinoma in Lynch syndrome
Published in
Familial Cancer, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10689-012-9526-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markku Aarnio, Matti Säily, Matti Juhola, Annette Gylling, Päivi Peltomäki, Heikki J. Järvinen, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin

Abstract

Increased risk for urological tumors has been observed in mutation carriers with Lynch syndrome (LS). In this study, we evaluated the clinical features of uroepithelial (bladder and ureter) and kidney cancers in 974 Finnish mutation carriers. Altogether 30 patients had a total of 34 urological tumors: 12 ureter, 12 bladder, and 10 kidney cancers. Urological tumor was the only tumor in 9 (30 %) patients, and metachronous other tumor occurred in 21 (70 %). The occurrence of uroepithelial cancers was significantly higher in MSH2 mutation carriers (6 %; 95 % CI, 2.7-11.0) than in MLH1 carriers (2 %; 95 % CI, 1.1-3.2) and MSH6 mutation carriers (0 %) (p = 0.014). The mean ages of patients at the time of diagnosis were: bladder cancer, 57 years; ureter cancer, 58 years; and kidney cancer, 64 years. Overall 5-year survival rates were 70 % (95 % CI, 0.32-0.89) in bladder cancer, 81 % (95 % CI, 0.45-0.95) in ureter cancer, and 75 % (95 % CI, 0.31-0.93) in kidney cancer. Cancer-specific 5-year survival rates were 70 % (95 % CI, 0.32-0.89) in bladder cancer, 91 % (95 % CI, 0.51-0.98) in ureter cancer, and 100 % in kidney cancer. In conclusion, early age of onset was observed in patients with uroepithelial tumors, but not in patients with kidney cancer. The frequency of uroepithelial tumors was significantly higher in MSH2 mutation carriers than in MLH1 carriers. Further studies with larger numbers of patients, however, are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of surveillance of urological tumors in LS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2012.
All research outputs
#13,128,940
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Familial Cancer
#252
of 558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,288
of 161,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Familial Cancer
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 558 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.