You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“One Health” or Three? Publication Silos Among the One Health Disciplines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Biology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002448 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kezia R. Manlove, Josephine G. Walker, Meggan E. Craft, Kathryn P. Huyvaert, Maxwell B. Joseph, Ryan S. Miller, Pauline Nol, Kelly A. Patyk, Daniel O’Brien, Daniel P. Walsh, Paul C. Cross |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 38 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 66% |
| Scientists | 17 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 226 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 26% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 33 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 18% |
| Unknown | 52 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#680,157
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#1,280
of 9,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,058
of 317,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#25
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.