↓ Skip to main content

Surface Acoustic Wave Nebulization Produces Ions with Lower Internal Energy than Electrospray Ionization

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Surface Acoustic Wave Nebulization Produces Ions with Lower Internal Energy than Electrospray Ionization
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13361-012-0352-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yue Huang, Sung Hwan Yoon, Scott R. Heron, Christophe D. Masselon, J. Scott Edgar, František Tureček, David R. Goodlett

Abstract

Surface acoustic wave nebulization (SAWN) has recently been reported as a novel method to transfer non-volatile analytes directly from solution to the gas phase for mass spectrometric analysis. Here we present a comparison of the survival yield of SAWN versus electrospray ionization (ESI) produced ions. A series of substituted benzylpyridinium (BzPy) compounds were utilized to measure ion survival yield from which ion energetics were inferred. We also estimated bond dissociation energies using higher level quantum chemical calculations than previously reported for BzPy ions. Additionally, the effects on BzPy precursor ion survival of SAWN operational parameters such as inlet capillary temperature and solution flow-rate were investigated. Under all conditions tested, SAWN-generated BzPy ions displayed a higher tendency for survival and thus have lower internal energies than those formed by ESI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 84 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 30%
Researcher 19 21%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Other 4 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 45 51%
Engineering 11 12%
Physics and Astronomy 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 11 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#2,721
of 3,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,863
of 173,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#9
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.