↓ Skip to main content

大学の経験学習型リーダーシップ教育における学生のリーダーシップ行動尺度の開発と信頼性および妥当性の検討

Overview of attention for article published in Japan Journal of Educational Technology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 379)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
54 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
大学の経験学習型リーダーシップ教育における学生のリーダーシップ行動尺度の開発と信頼性および妥当性の検討
Published in
Japan Journal of Educational Technology, September 2019
DOI 10.15077/jjet.43004
Authors

木村 充, 舘野 泰一, 松井 彩子, 中原 淳

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,004,216
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Japan Journal of Educational Technology
#2
of 379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,082
of 350,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japan Journal of Educational Technology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them