You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of morbidity following regional nodal dissection in the axilla and groin for metastatic melanoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ans.13526 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane E. Theodore, Adam J. Frankel, Janine M. Thomas, Andrew P. Barbour, Gerard J. Bayley, Christopher P. Allan, Michael Wagels, B. Mark Smithers |
| Abstract |
This study assessed and compared the morbidity of nodal dissection in the axilla and groin including sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), completion lymph node dissection for a positive SLNB (CLND) and therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) with and without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Patients who had nodal dissection in the axilla or groin for cutaneous melanoma over an 18-year period (1995-2013) were prospectively documented on a database. The median follow-up was nearly 3 years. Early complications and clinically relevant lymphoedema were retrospectively analysed to assess the incidence and differences between the region and type of nodal surgery. Included were 1521 patients following nodal dissection in the axilla (916 patients) and groin (605 patients). Less early complications occurred following SLNB in the axilla compared with the groin (5% versus 14%, P = 0.0001). Early complications were similar for CLND and TLND in the groin (49% versus 43%, P = 0.879) and axilla (28% versus 33%, P = 0.607). Moderate to severe lymphoedema rates were similar following axillary SLNB and CLND (6% versus 8%, P = 0.407). The lymphoedema rate for groin SLNB was lower than CLND (10% versus 20%, P = 0.063). No significant difference in lymphoedema rates followed CLND and TLND in each region. Following TLND, RT increased lymphoedema rates. Morbidity may occur following SLNB with the groin having a higher rate of early complications and lymphoedema compared with the axilla. The morbidity following CLND and TLND were similar. Lymphoedema rates were increased following RT. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 23% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 60% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery
#1,730
of 2,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,398
of 313,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery
#30
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,617 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.