↓ Skip to main content

Nature and nurture in stuttering: a systematic review on the case of Moses

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Sciences, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Nature and nurture in stuttering: a systematic review on the case of Moses
Published in
Neurological Sciences, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10072-012-0984-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fidias E. Leon-Sarmiento, Edwin Paez, Mark Hallett

Abstract

Stuttering is a disturbance of normal fluency of speech whose pathophysiology is still not well understood. We investigated one of the most ancient speech disorders in the biblical person Moses who lived in approximately 1300 BC. To get the most complete medical and non-medical information on Moses, we did systematic searches in the Holy Bible using the Bible-Discovery v2.3© software ( http://www.bible-discovery.com ) looking for verses containing the terms "Moses", "Stuttering" and "Stutter"; and in PubMed/Medline database for manuscripts having the terms "Moses", "Bible" and "Stuttering". From the Bible search, 742 verses were found, of which 23 were relevant; three additional verses were found by hand search. Six papers discussing Moses's pathology were found in the PubMed search. The analysis of ancient descriptions in the light of current research suggests that stuttering is the most likely pathology Moses had, with clear evidence for both genetic origin and environmental triggers. Further, it was found that Moses practiced some "sensory tricks" that could be used to relieve his speech disorder which are, to our knowledge, the first "tricks" that successfully modulated a movement disorder described in the medical literature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Arts and Humanities 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%