↓ Skip to main content

Chemical Signals of Elephant Musth: Temporal Aspects of Microbially-Mediated Modifications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Chemical Signals of Elephant Musth: Temporal Aspects of Microbially-Mediated Modifications
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10886-011-0056-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas E. Goodwin, Laura J. Broederdorf, Blake A. Burkert, Innocent H. Hirwa, Daniel B. Mark, Zach J. Waldrip, Randall A. Kopper, Mark V. Sutherland, Elizabeth W. Freeman, Julie A. Hollister-Smith, Bruce A. Schulte

Abstract

Mature male African (Loxodonta africana) and Asian (Elephas maximus) elephants exhibit periodic episodes of musth, a state in which serum androgens are elevated, food intake typically decreases, aggressiveness often increases, and breeding success is enhanced. Urine is a common source of chemical signals in a variety of mammals. Elephants in musth dribble urine almost continuously for lengthy periods, suggesting that the chemicals in their urine may reveal their physiological condition to conspecifics. We investigated the volatile urinary chemicals in captive male elephants using automated solid phase dynamic extraction (SPDE) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). We found higher levels of alkan-2-ones, alkan-2-ols, and some aromatic compounds in urine from males in musth than in urine from non-musth males or from females. Levels of ketones and alcohols increased as the urine aged, likely due to microbial metabolism of fatty acids. Protein-derived aromatic metabolites also increased in abundance after urination, likely due to microbial hydrolysis of hydrophilic conjugates. We suggest that microbes may play an important role in timed release of urinary semiochemicals during elephant musth.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Zimbabwe 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 43%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2012.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#1,806
of 2,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,388
of 254,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.