| Title |
Mechanotransduction in neuronal cell development and functioning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biophysical Reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12551-019-00587-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Chighizola, Tania Dini, Cristina Lenardi, Paolo Milani, Alessandro Podestà, Carsten Schulte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 11% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 130 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 19% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 16% |
| Engineering | 18 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,257,657
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#51
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,510
of 354,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.