↓ Skip to main content

Re-Thinking the Human: Heidegger, Fundamental Ontology, and Humanism

Overview of attention for article published in Human Studies, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Re-Thinking the Human: Heidegger, Fundamental Ontology, and Humanism
Published in
Human Studies, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10746-010-9136-y
Authors

Gavin Rae

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Student > Master 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 29%
Philosophy 9 26%
Arts and Humanities 8 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,847
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Human Studies
#164
of 296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,034
of 79,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Studies
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 296 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them