↓ Skip to main content

Reactivation of occult hepatitis B virus infection under treatment with abatacept: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Reactivation of occult hepatitis B virus infection under treatment with abatacept: a case report
Published in
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40360-016-0060-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rossella Talotta, Fabiola Atzeni, Piercarlo Sarzi Puttini

Abstract

Abatacept (ABA) is a fusion receptor protein containing the CTLA-4 domain that prevents the activation of naïve T cells by binding the CD80 and CD86 molecules expressed on the surface of dendritic cells, indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There is still little evidence concerning the safety of ABA in RA patients with positive serology for hepatitis virus B (HBV) infection. We report the case of a HBV infection reactivation in an ABA-treated male RA patient. The patient (caucasian race, 66-year-old) was diagnosed with RA in Novembre 2010 and in December 2010 he started a treatment with prednisone plus subcutaneous methotrexate. In October 2011, an anti-TNF agent (golimumab) was added but soon discontinued due to an adverse event. At baseline, screening for HBV markers showed a positivity for HBcAb and HBeAb IgG, being HBsAg, HBsAb, HBcAb IgM, HBeAg and HBV DNA negative. Serum amino-transferase (AST and ALT) levels were within the normal range. In January 2012 he was swapped to intravenous treatment with ABA 750 mg/month, that allowed the achievement of a good clinical response and the permanent discontinuation of corticosteroids. In November 2013, laboratory reports showed that he was positive for HBcAb but negative for the remaining HBV markers, and had a slightly increased AST level and, in December 2013, he became HBV DNA positive (326 IU/mL). In January 2014, his HBV DNA levels had further increased and ABA was stopped while maintaining MTX. He started lamivudine 100 mg/day in January 2014. After 1 month of lamivudine, his HBV DNA levels became undetectable (<10 IU/mL) and liver function was normal although RA had been reactivated (DAS28 5.53). Treatment with ABA was therefore resumed with the achievement of a good response after 6 months. The patient is currently being treated with lamivudine 100 mg/day, i.v. ABA 750 mg/month, and MTX 15 mg/week, with a good response (DAS28 2.27 in October 2015), and constantly monitored without any further evidence of HBV infection reactivation. Although there are still few reports in literature, we suggest caution in HBV- occult carriers RA patients undergoing a treatment with abatacept.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Other 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,258,962
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#204
of 440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,108
of 299,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.