↓ Skip to main content

FABP4 is a candidate marker of cerebellar liponeurocytomas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
FABP4 is a candidate marker of cerebellar liponeurocytomas
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11060-012-0853-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Anghileri, Marica Eoli, Rosina Paterra, Paolo Ferroli, Bianca Pollo, Valeria Cuccarini, Emanuela Maderna, Giovanni Tringali, Marco Saini, Ettore Salsano, Gaetano Finocchiaro

Abstract

Cerebellar liponeurocytoma (cLPN) is a very rare central nervous system (CNS) tumour recently recognized as a clinical and pathological entity distinct from medulloblastoma (MB), and included in the WHO classification of CNS tumours under the heading "glioneuronal tumours". cLPN typically develop in adult age and have a favourable prognosis compared with MB. In this work, we reviewed the clinical and neuroradiological data of two novel cases of adult cLPN diagnosed at our institution; one patient developed distant metastases. We tried to identify novel molecular markers for this malignancy. We found that the transcription factor NEUROG1 (but not ATOH1) is expressed in cLPN, unlike normal adult cerebellum, and that fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4), typically found in adipocytes, is significantly overexpressed compared with both normal adult cerebellum and human MB. These findings suggest cLPN occur as a result of transformation of cerebellar progenitors, which are distinct from cerebellar granule progenitors, and aberrantly differentiate into adipocyte-like tumour cells. They also suggest that analysis of FABP4 expression is of help to differentiate cLPN from MB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,445
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,223
of 2,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,244
of 161,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,954 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.